Five Months After iStock Unification

The end of this month marks 5 months since the iStock unification with Getty Images (you can read more about that process here). Where I live in Melbourne, Australia the end of this month also marks the end of the financial year which is a good time to assess the changes at iStock. So here it is – a review, five months after iStock unification.

I’ve divided this up to consider key elements of being an iStock contributor.

Element 1 – The File Upload Process. Prior to February 2017 there were 2 main ways to upload – either directly through the iStock site or via an application called DeepMeta. I had always uploaded directly to the iStock site. Since unification with Getty Images there are now three main ways to upload – via DeepMeta, via qHero or directly into the Getty Images ESP site. I have been using qHero and find it a very easy and efficient way to submit files. I consider the upload process an improvement on the old way.


qHero is an easy and efficient uploading tool

Element 2 – Key wording. Key wording your stock images can be an arduous process. I find keywording batches of files in qHero very easy and again would consider this an improvement.

Element 3 – Inspection Times. The time taken to review files have been a major step forward since the unification. As an exclusive contributor my files are often reviewed within minutes of being uploaded. In the last 5 months I can’t recall any file taking more than 12 hours to review. This is an improvement. So have these 3 elements have been an improvement – good job Getty Images and iStock! Unfortunately, that’s where the good news ends.

Element 4 – Downloads. Yes, this is what we are submitting files to microstock sites for – to have users download our images and to generate an income. My total number of uploads has increased thanks to the easy to use upload process using qHero. My download numbers have remained static. That’s a little disappointing but I’m trusting that those downloads will come. My experience is one of not improving or declining since unification.

Element 5 – Download Statistics. iStock used to offer real time reporting of downloads and royalties and the ability to request payment once per week. This was great for contributors but is unfortunately a thing of the past. Today we get payment once per month, and the reporting is vastly inferior to what was offered 5 years ago. Unfortunately whatever money was saved in the unification process has not yet been funneled into better reporting for contributors. iStock continue to advise that this is being worked on as a matter of high priority, but as at today, this remains a point of frustration for contributors. Currently this is inferior to what was offered before unification.


Queen Victoria Market, Melbourne

Element 6 – Royalty Income for Contributors. This refers to my own income only, which is down on last year. That means that despite the improvements for contributors and buyers on the iStock website, my income from iStock is below where it was before unification. That might be driven by changes in the market for stock images, or more likely by the prices being charged to buyers and the corresponding royalty received by contributors. Unfortunately at this point for me, the royalty I’m achieving is below what I was achieving before unification. Many other exclusive contributors are having the same experience. I’m hopeful this situation will reverse and am focusing on contributing more unique content. Time will tell.

Are you an iStock contributor? What is your experience?

Thanks for reading Five Months After iStock Unification.

2 thoughts on “Five Months After iStock Unification

  1. Nils

    As a non-exclusive contributor, I have to mostly agree. My editorial files are not being examined quite as quickly as yours, but it is still a vast improvement on before. I have had a couple of months that gave me real hope of an increase in sales, but that appears to have been an aberration rather than the start of an upwards trend.

    I have been submitting a fair bit of additional content in the past couple of months after downloading Stocksubmitter. However from what I can tell, the files that are selling are the same old files that sold beforehand. So like you I am waiting on recent uploads to actually start earning something to justify the effort.

    Having said that, Shutterstock has also had a slowdown this year compared to last year. And Dreamstime continues to be pretty dead. If upload wasn’t so easy I wouldn’t be bothering at all. So don’t think that the grass is necessarily greener on the other side.

    1. Craig Dingle Post author

      It’s an interesting time in the stock photography world Nils. The new upload process at iStock is a big step forward, but the performance of newer files and the lack of reporting (currently) are major negatives. I’ve added a lot of new content over the last 2 months, which is quite different from my other content. It will be interesting to see if it gets downloaded. Thanks for sharing your own experience with Beyond Here readers.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *